Llama 3.1 8B Instruct · one GPU per deployment
Find a measured GPU result that fits your limits.
Explore how prompt length, concurrent requests and latency limits change the historical cost comparison.
Choose a workload to begin
Compare five measured provider/GPU deployments across six workload settings.
Historical cost versus first-token latency
Lower and further left is better on these two metrics. Circles meet all your limits; crosses exceed at least one. An outer ring marks your baseline. Numbers match the buttons below.
Choose a deployment below to inspect its measured values.
What these results can tell you
These are synthetic random-token workloads with three runs per result: 64 requests per run at concurrency 8, or 128 at concurrency 32. A run-level p95 is not a production guarantee or a confidence interval. Aggregate output throughput differs from an individual user's generation speed.
Historical token costs exclude idle time and other operating costs. The standard protocol and separately reviewed historical evidence remain labelled. Immutable model/tokenizer revisions, regions and complete startup settings remain unverified. Check representative traffic, current prices and availability before choosing infrastructure.
Methodology and limitations · Suggest future research